Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Statewide City Employees Retirement System

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1967No. 38363PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, C. J.

This case involves interpretation of a statute which provides pension benefits for certain city employees. We are being asked to determine whether a policeman who was permanently and totally disabled in the line of duty is eligible for a pension under this statute.

The essential facts are stipulated. Appellant became a police officer for the city of Auburn Police Department in August of 1959. He became a member of respondent statewide city employees retirement system on July 8, 1960, when Auburn joined respondent organization. Appellant, while acting in the line of duty as a motorcycle…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Alderwood Water District v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Tembruell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. RinkesWashington Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Dioxin/Organochlorine Ctr. v. POLLUTION CONTROLWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Center v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Human Rights Commission Hearing TribunalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API