Bowen v. Statewide City Employees Retirement System
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, C. J.
This case involves interpretation of a statute which provides pension benefits for certain city employees. We are being asked to determine whether a policeman who was permanently and totally disabled in the line of duty is eligible for a pension under this statute.
The essential facts are stipulated. Appellant became a police officer for the city of Auburn Police Department in August of 1959. He became a member of respondent statewide city employees retirement system on July 8, 1960, when Auburn joined respondent organization. Appellant, while acting in the line of duty as a motorcycle…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Alderwood Water District v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Tembruell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. RinkesWashington Supreme Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Dioxin/Organochlorine Ctr. v. POLLUTION CONTROLWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Center v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Human Rights Commission Hearing TribunalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.