Letterman v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
This is an action against the city of Tacoma and the Firemen’s Pension Board of that city. Plaintiff, an active fireman, seeks a judgment declaring his pension rights.
S. R. Letterman began working for the city of Tacoma as a fireman on January 17,1929, and was steadily employed thereafter for twenty-eight years. Effective on January 26, 1957, the board retired Mr. Letterman at his request. He was retired pursuant to Laws of 1929, chapter 86, p. 144. On February 4, 1957, however, the board decided that it had made a mistake, and determined that plaintiff Letterman should be retired pursuant to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. the PraetoriansTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Casco Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1951
- Frach v. SchoettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Eisenbacher v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Leonard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Francisco v. Board of Directors of Bellevue Public Schools, District No. 405Washington Supreme Court · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.