Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. McLain

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1896No. 17,191PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the' Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This was an action for. damages brought by the appellee for personal injuries, caused, as alleged, by the negligence of the appellant.

The accident occurred at a point on appellant’s line of road a little east of where the same crosses the Indianapolis Belt Railroad, and while appellant’s train was approaching the city from the east, between ten and eleven o’clock on the night of June 28, 1888.

Appellee was a passenger, and it appears that he *189wished to leave the train at the crossing of the Belt road.

It is alleged in the, complaint that as the train neared the city, the appellee “inquired of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. CarperIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HazzardIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Hoehn v. Chicago, Peoria & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. WingateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Etc., Railway Co. v. MoneyhunIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Borders v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DuganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Terre Haute Electric Co. v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Emerson Brantingham Co. v. GroweIndiana Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API