Emerson Brantingham Co. v. Growe
Indiana Supreme Court
From Jackson Circuit Court; Oren O. Swails, Judge. Action by Arthur C. Growe against the Emerson Brantingham Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1394, cl. 2, Bums 1914, Acts 1901 p. 567, §10.)
1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, C. J.
Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for damages for the loss of an eye, alleged to have been destroyed by a flying sliver of steel when “a cold cut,” or chisel was struck by a sledge hammer in appellant’s factory. Appellant has assigned as error the overruling of its demurrers to each of the amended first paragraph and the second paragraph of the complaint, and of its motion for a new trial.
1. The amended first paragraph of the complaint alleged, among other things, that the appellant was a corporation engaged in manufacturing farm implements at Columbus, Indiana, and had in its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Brown v. WillIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Terre Haute Electric Co. v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Myers v. W. C. DePauw Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Richey v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schaum v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Kornec v. Mike Horse Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
- Illinois Steel Company v. FullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Magenheimer v. State Ex Rel. DaltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
- Berkley v. Burlington Cadillac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.