Legal Opinion

Daryl K. and Linda L. Mullinix v. Killgore's Salmon River Fruit Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2015No. 41583PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

This' appeal involves Respondents Daryl and Linda Mullinix’s (collectively “Mullinix”) right to use Appellant Killgore’s Salmon River Fruit Co.’s (Killgore) pipeline to convey water from Joe Creek. Both parties have water rights pursuant to partial decrees from the Snake River Basin Adjudication (SRBA) to obtain water from Joe Creek. The parties also entered into a private Settlement Agreement, which required that Mullinix’s point of diversion was below Killgore’s point of diversion on Joe Creek. After the parties entered into this Agreement, Mullinix…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Borah v. McCandlessIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. MussellIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Le VequeIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. Gracie Jean TryonIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. City of Sandpoint v. Independent Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Hepworth Holzer, LLP v. Fourth Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  5. McInturff v. Shippy (In Re Csrba Case No. 49576, Subcase No. 91-7094. )Idaho Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API