Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Mussell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 2003No. 28713PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages resulting from the interference with an easement. We affirm the judgment as modified and remand this case for further modification of the amount to award as damages.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The plaintiff Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (District) is a duly organized irrigation district under Idaho law.- It has an extensive system of canals, laterals, and sub-laterals providing water to approximately 64,000 acres of residential, agricultural, and industrial lands located in Ada and Canyon counties in Idaho. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weld County Bd. of County Com'rs v. SlovekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Washington Federal SavingsIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Gustaves v. GustavesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Row v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Rowley v. FuhrmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Ridgley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Beckie Price v. High Pointe Oil Co IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Weitz v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API