Legal Opinion

Trowbridge v. Briggs

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 1934No. Civ. No. 8647PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

Appellants herein, J. A. Briggs and Marie Plane Briggs, his wife, appeal from a judgment for damages in favor of respondents. (plaintiffs below) A. L. Trowbridge and Mamie Trowbridge, his wife, and from a judgment in favor of respondent (a co-defendant below) F. M. Meek upon a cross-complaint of appellants against him, and from an order denying the motion for new trial made by appellants.

The- respondents Trowbridge and wife, as plaintiffs, commenced this action against Briggs and wife and respondent F. M. Meek, as well as several other defendants sued under fictitious…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Comstock v. MorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Miner v. Dabney-Johnson Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hausken v. ComanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Anderson v. FreisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Johnston v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Martin v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Cleveland v. Estate of EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API