Trowbridge v. Briggs
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, J., pro tem.
Appellants herein, J. A. Briggs and Marie Plane Briggs, his wife, appeal from a judgment for damages in favor of respondents. (plaintiffs below) A. L. Trowbridge and Mamie Trowbridge, his wife, and from a judgment in favor of respondent (a co-defendant below) F. M. Meek upon a cross-complaint of appellants against him, and from an order denying the motion for new trial made by appellants.
The- respondents Trowbridge and wife, as plaintiffs, commenced this action against Briggs and wife and respondent F. M. Meek, as well as several other defendants sued under fictitious…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Comstock v. MorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Miner v. Dabney-Johnson Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hausken v. ComanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Anderson v. FreisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Johnston v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Martin v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Cleveland v. Estate of EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936