Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Continental Vitamin Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 24, 1966No. 65 Civ. 3892PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOHEY, District Judge.. Continental Vitamin Corporation (Con-.Rental) is a New Jersey corporation, Tt 18 not llcensed to do busmess and has "? of.ñce in New Y?rk' 11 Amoved to dlsmiss the complaint m this breach of ?ontract actl0n’ for lack of in Personam ; or, m lieu thereof, to quash *ke ™ons served upon its president m dersef' ,Tke City of New York f^ity) contends its claim arose out of Continentals transaction of business in New York and therefore falls within the ambit of section 302(a) (1) of New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR); and that, accordingly, in per-sonam…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- United States v. The Montreal Trust Company, and Tillie v. Lechtzier, Executors of the Estateof Isidor J. Klein, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Kramer v. VoglNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Agrashell, Inc. v. Bernard Sirotta Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- A. Millner Co. v. Noudar, Lda.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marival, Inc. v. Planes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Borden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967