Irgang v. Pelton & Crane Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.
Defendant, a nondomiciliary foreign corporation moves, pursuant to subdivision 8 of rule 3211 of the Civil Practice Law, and Buies, for a judgment dismissing the action on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction over defendant. This gives rise to the question whether plaintiff has shown enough to establish that defendant was doing business in New York sufficient for jurisdiction pursuant to section 301 *71of the Civil Practice Law and Buies, or to establish that defendant was transacting or had transacted ££ any business within the state ”, pursuant to section 302 (subd. [a], par. 1) of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Elish v. St. Louis Southwestern RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Steele v. De LeeuwNew York Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stark Carpet Corporation v. M-Geough Robinson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Potter's Photographic Applications Co. v. Ealing CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, SA (Cruzeiro)District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Fosen v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Northland Paper Company v. Mohawk Tablet CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.