Legal Opinion

Steele v. De Leeuw

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1963PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoxi, J.

Motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint upon the moving defendant, N. V. Beleco, a foreign corporation, on the ground that it is a foreign corporation which is not doing business in the State and is not subject to the jurisdiction of this court, is denied.

Section 302 (subd. [a], par. 1) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, effective September 1, 1963, commonly known as “ a single-act statute ’ ’ is controlling. This is true, even though the cause of action accrued and the action commenced prior to *808the effective date of the statute. This new statute, modeled upon the Illinois…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Simonson v. International BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. SchneiderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Carmichael v. SnyderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
  4. Ventling v. KraftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hoffman Motors Corporation v. Alfa Romeo SpADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API