Legal Opinion

Engelhardt v. Shields & Co.

Nassau County District Court

Decided March 16, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillis B. Carman, J.

This is a motion by defendants to dismiss the complaint upon two grounds. First, that this court lacks jurisdiction of the persons of the defendants and second, that this action may not be maintained because of the Statute of Limitations.

I will first consider whether this court has jurisdiction. The cases as I read them offer no definite guide as to what set of facts actually constitute transacting business. However, they seem to require (a) that the defendants may not be called upon to defend in this court unless they had “minimal contacts,” *8with Nassau County in connection with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Home Crafts, Inc. v. Gramercy Homes, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1964
  2. Elkan v. Clyde L. Hindman Agency, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mermis v. Weeden & Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. I. Oliver Engebretson, Inc. v. Aruba Palm Beach Hotel & CasinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Vacuum Instrument Corp. v. EPM Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co. v. ScalleatCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API