Nowell v. British-American Assurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on insurance policy; from city court of Bainbridge— Judge Spooner. July 13, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The action was based upon a fire-insurance policy containing the following provisions: “This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void if the insured now has or shall hereafter make or procure any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on property covered in *47whole or in part by this policy.” “This policy is made and accepted subject to the foregoing stipulations and conditions printed on back hereof, which are hereby specially referred to and made a part of this policy, together with other provisions, agreements, or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Athens Mutual Insurance v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Lippman v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Morris v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Beasley v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Georgia Auto & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. StandridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Johnson v. Pacific Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Bruce v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.