Legal Opinion

Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. Franklin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 2, 1924No. 3985PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

The policy of fire insurance involved in this case contains these provisions: “It is a condition of this policy that it shall be null and void if the interest of the assured in the property be other than unconditional or sole ownership, or if the subject of this insurance be or become encumbered by any lien or mortgage except as otherwise endorsed hereon. . . It is a condition of this policy that failure on the part of the assured to render such sworn statement of loss to this company within sixty days of the date of loss (unless such time is extended in writing by the company) shall render…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Johnson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Bernhard v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  4. Thompson v. Traders' InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. Clay v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. CumbaaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Assurance Co. of America v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. New York Underwriters Insurance v. NolesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. First of Georgia Insurance v. JoseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API