Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1923No. 14811PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, O. J.

1. Where a policy of fire insurance contains a stipulation that “unless otherwise provided by agreement, endorsed hereon or added hereto,” it “shall be void, if any change, other than by death of the assured, takes place in the interest, title or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants without increase of hazard), whether by legal process or judgment or by voluntary act of the insured, or otherwise,” and contains a stipulation that “unless otherwise provided by agreement, endorsed hereon or added hereto,” it “shall be void if the insured now has or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lippman v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Beasley v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. McAfee v. Dixie Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Nowell v. British-American Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Long v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API