Lippman v. Ætna Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action on insurance policy. Before Judge Littlejohn. Macon superior court. November term, 1898.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
Lippman, suing for the use of Lewis and others, brought suit on a policy of fire-insurance. Attached to and forming a part of the policy was a printed slip containing these words: “ No other concurrent insurance permitted.” This was signed by the agent. Another clause of the policy is in-the following language: “This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void if the insured now has or shall hereafter make or procure any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on the property covered in whole or in part by this policy.” Still…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Walsh v. . Hartford Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Marvin v. . Universal Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- City Fire Insurance v. CarrugiSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Simonton, Jones & Hatcher v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Johnson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Parris & Son, Inc. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Athens Mutual Insurance v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.