Johnson v. Pacific Fire Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on insurance policy; from city court of Hall county— Judge Wheeler. November 20, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtBboxdes, P. J.
1. The policy of fire insurance upon personal property on which the suit wafe based contained the following stipulation: “This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement endors'ed hereon or added hereto, shall be void ... if the subject of insurance be personal property and be or become incumbered by a chattel mortgage.” The petition as amended showing upon its face that the personalty covered by the contract of insurance was so incumbered at the time the policy was issued, and it not being alleged that the insurance company knew of this incumbrance, or that it had, by endorsement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clay v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Alston v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Finleyson Bros. v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Liddell Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. SmylySupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Smyly v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922