Legal Opinion
Hoppe v. G.D. Searle & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 25, 1991No. 88 Civ. 2558 (JFK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEENAN, District Judge:
Plaintiff chose the second week of trial in this action to file a motion requesting that defendant be collaterally estopped from relitigating the issues of intentional misrepresentation and false advertising that constitute counts two and six of the complaint. Notwithstanding the peculiar timing of this motion, the Court has entertained the application. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion is denied.
Plaintiff bases her collateral estoppel argument on the jury verdict rendered in a prior Cu-7 case, Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Bendectin Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Kern v. HettingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Robert C. Stovall, Jr. v. Price Waterhouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- B.N.E. Swedbank, S.A. v. BankerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Anderson v. Bungee International Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Lyons Ex Rel. Lyons v. AndersenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Walker v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1992