Legal Opinion
B.N.E. Swedbank, S.A. v. Banker
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1992No. 89 Civ. 7322 (RWS)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants, Pravin Banker (“Banker”), Huguette Banker a/k/a Huguette Pestel (“Pestel”), Pravin Banker Associates, Ltd. (“Pravin Banker Associates”), Prabank Capital Ltd. (“Prabank”), and Global Financial Group, Ltd. (“Global”), have all moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order granting them summary judgment and dismissing Plaintiff B.N.E., Swedbank, S.A.’s (“B.N.E.”) amended complaint against them. BNE has also moved for summary judgment against the Defendants with respect to the first count of the amended complaint. For the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- German by German v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Shamis v. Ambassador Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- ICD Holdings S.A. v. FrankelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.