Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Bungee International Manufacturing Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 7, 1999No. 96 CIV. 186(MGC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Ronald E. Anderson, Jr. sues for serious injury to his eye caused by a rebounding hook on a stretchable cord manufactured by defendant Bungee International Manufacturing Corp. (“Bungee”). Anderson asserts that the design of Bungee cords is defective and unreasonably dangerous. Anderson moves for partial summary judgment based on the affirmative use of collateral estoppel to establish his claim of design defect. Bungee moves for summary judgment on Anderson’s claims for breach of express warranty and duty to warn. Defendant The Home Depot, Inc. joins in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Joseph Gelb v. Royal Globe Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Lara v. Delta International Machinery Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Daley v. McNeil Consumer Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Simmons v. Washing Equipment TechnologiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Coburn v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.