Legal Opinion
Molnar v. Administrator, Unemployment Comp. Act
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided September 5, 1995No. File 124172PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtW. Sullivan, J.
Pursuant to General Statutes § 31-249b, the plaintiff, Albert Molnar, appeals a decision of the defendant, the administrator of the unemployment compensation act, affirming the decision of the appeals referee that denied the plaintiffs petition for unemployment benefits.
In May, 1988, the plaintiff suffered severe leg injuries in the course of his employment, and upon being eligible to return to work, applied for unemployment compensation on July 11, 1994. The examiner denied his application in a decision dated July 13, 1994, using authority granted under General Statutes § 31-241. On August…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Molnar v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Pace Air Services, Inc. v. Administrator, No. Cv96 33 13 19 S (Feb. 9, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Thompson v. Unemployment Administrator, No. Cv 97 0064844 S (Jan. 12, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Yurechko v. Administrator, No. Cv990060823s (Dec. 3, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001