Legal Opinion

Pace Air Services, Inc. v. Administrator, No. Cv96 33 13 19 S (Feb. 9, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 9, 1998No. CV96 33 13 19 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Pace Air Services, Inc. appeals under General Statutes §31-249b from a decision of the Employment Security Board of Review allowing a former employee of Pace, Donald Hancock, to receive unemployment compensation benefits. Hancock was discharged from employment after Pace learned that a urinalysis test showed he had ingested cocaine. Pace claims (1) that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations1 preempted or CT Page 1436 invalidated the provisions of the Connecticut Unemployment Compensation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Guevara v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Cervantes v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Calnan v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Fellin v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API