Legal Opinion
S.B. Partnership v. Gogue
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Vernaline Gogue was evicted from an apartment owned by S.B. Partnership d/b/a Canyon Lake Plaza Estates. Her federally subsidized lease required written notice containing specific grounds for termination. Are state court eviction proceedings suffi cient to provide the notice and due process protections required by federal law? We conclude the state unlawful detainer action fulfilled federal mandates because the amended complaint set forth adequate grounds, and Gogue was afforded a hearing before eviction.
Facts
[¶ 2.] Gogue and Canyon Lake entered into a lease…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Centrol, Inc. v. MorrowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tunender v. MinnaertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Prairie Lakes Health Care System, Inc. v. WookeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Schrank v. Pennington County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Arnold Murray Construction, L.L.C. v. HicksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Lakota Community Homes, Inc. v. RandallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.