Legal Opinion

Centrol, Inc. v. Morrow

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1992No. 17417PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Defendants challenge the non-competition and non-disclosure provisions of their employment contracts and damages awarded for breach of same.

FACTS

Centrol, Inc. of South Dakota (Centrol) is a South Dakota cooperative consisting of member cooperatives. It provides customized soil and crop consulting services to farmers through employees known as “crop consultants.” These crop consultants develop a wide variety of valuable and confidential information. To protect this information and customer good will, Centrol required its crop consultants to execute employment agreements with…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New JerseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Flockhart v. WyantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wangen v. KnudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Schaffer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Micro Data Base Systems, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Dharma Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Rehm v. LenzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API