Legal Opinion
Arnold Murray Construction, L.L.C. v. Hicks
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Justice
[¶ 1.] Arnold Murray Construction, L.L.C. sued Eugene Hicks for possession of his apartment pursuant to SDCL 21-16-1, alleging that he had been disturbing his neighbors, violating parking rules and blocking open the security door. Hicks claimed that he was entitled to reasonable accommodations under the Fair Housing Act Amendments because he was disabled. The trial court ordered Hicks to surrender possession of the apartment. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] Arnold Murray Construction, L.L.C. (AMC) owns and operates an eighteen unit residential apartment complex at 615½ West 11th Street in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Stout v. Kokomo Manor ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Roe v. Housing Authority of City of BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Roe v. Sugar River Mills AssociatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sinisgallo v. Town of Islip Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Josephinium Associates v. KahliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Icehouse, Inc. v. GeisslerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Josephinium Associates v. KahliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.