Legal Opinion

Brown v. Mortensen

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided January 3, 2019No. B281704PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURREY, J.*

*935This case resolves two obscure and previously unaddressed state constitutional issues: Does article I, section 16 of the California Constitution guarantee the right to a jury trial for (1) nominal statutory damages claims, and/or (2) claims for attorneys' fees, under the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) ( Civ. Code, §§ 56 et seq.1 )?

With little useful guidance from the parties, no controlling precedent, and the three-year postremittitur deadline for bringing the case to trial about to expire,2 the experienced and highly regarded trial judge concluded it does…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Caira v. OffnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chai v. Velocity Investments, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  2. Guracar v. Student Loan SolutionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Mackovksa v. Viewcrest Road Properties LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Yeh v. Barrington PacificCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API