Brown v. Mortensen
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the Court
CURREY, J.*
*935This case resolves two obscure and previously unaddressed state constitutional issues: Does article I, section 16 of the California Constitution guarantee the right to a jury trial for (1) nominal statutory damages claims, and/or (2) claims for attorneys' fees, under the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) ( Civ. Code, §§ 56 et seq.1 )?
With little useful guidance from the parties, no controlling precedent, and the three-year postremittitur deadline for bringing the case to trial about to expire,2 the experienced and highly regarded trial judge concluded it does…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Caira v. OffnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chai v. Velocity Investments, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Guracar v. Student Loan SolutionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Mackovksa v. Viewcrest Road Properties LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Yeh v. Barrington PacificCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026