Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LOONEY, Justice.
The appellant, a corporation engaged in the 'insurance business, brought this suit •under the Declaratory Judgments Act, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 22442 — 1, seeking judgment declaring that on November 12, 1945, there was not in force and effect any contract of insurance issued by it protecting N. O. Rogers against claims that might be filed against him as a result of the operation of his Ford automobile. Rogers claimed that on November 12, 1945, he had what is commonly known as a standard automobile liability insurance policy, issued by appellant, which obligated it with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nippolt v. Firemen's Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Richmond v. Travelers' InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- City Mortgage Discount Co. v. Palatine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- American Central Insurance v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Harper & Co. v. Ginners Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Burch v. Commonwealth County Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
- Ebert v. FORT PIERRE MOOSE LODGE 1813South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Standard Casualty Company v. BoydSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Hodge v. National Fidelity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Boone v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.