Burch v. Commonwealth County Mutual Insurance Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Justice.
We adopt and extend to the facts of this case the general rule, thought by some to be inapplicable in Texas, that a contract of property insurance may, if the parties so intend, effectively protect against a loss occurring prior to issuance of the policy provided neither the applicant nor the insurer knew of the loss when the contract was made.
Albert Daniel Burch, petitioner, is the assured. Commonwealth County Mutual Insurance Company, respondent, is the insurer. A family automobile policy was issued in petitioner’s name by respondent’s general agent, Ideal Insurance Agency,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PatryasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alliance Ins. v. Continental Gin Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Bankers Lloyds v. MontgomeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Mallard v. Hardware Indemnity Ins. Co. of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Lennar Corp. v. Great American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Gulf Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- Inland Waters Pollution Control, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Travis, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.