Nippolt v. Firemen's Ins.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant, the Firemen’s Insurance Company of Chicago, 111., from an order of the District Court of Ramsey County, Charles D. Kerr, J., made September 25, 1893, denying its motion for a new trial after verdict in favor of plaintiff, Andrew Nippolt, for $857.20.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
Plaintiff was the owner of a carriage manufacturing establishment in St. Paul. His brother-in-law was the special agent of the Denver Insurance Company, and on January 9, 1891, he procured plaintiff to take out a policy of insurance in that company, insuring plaintiff’s stock in trade to the amount of $1,000 for one year, and the policy was signed and delivered by L. R. Ware, the local agent. Plaintiff, during the year, procured from other agents two other policies of insurance in other companies on this stock for the amount of $1,000, each of which was in force at the time of the fire…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. McElroyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Matlock ex rel. Matlock v. HollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Oster v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.