Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Pucel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1999No. C7-98-1875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On August 7, 1998, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility charged respondent, Cherylyn Trousdell Pu-cel, with unprofessional conduct in connection with her representation of Darby Opsahl. Respondent failed to respond to the charges and to appear at the September 10, 1998 prehearing meeting. The Director then filed and served a Petition for Disciplinary Action based on the August 7, 1998 charges. Again respondent failed to answer, and on November 2, 1998, the director filed a Motion for Summary Relief. On November 23,1998, we granted the Director’s motion and…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SiglerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PlummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OrrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against CrisseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API