Opsahl v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
This case comes to us from the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing for post-conviction relief. On October 23, 1992, a jury convicted appellant, Darby Jon Opsahl, of the 1986 murder of Margaret Rehmann. The state based its case on statements Opsahl made to police during the initial investigation of the crime and on testimony of several of Opsahl’s acquaintances who claimed to have heard Opsahl make certain admissions about the murder. We affirmed. Opsahl then brought this claim for posteonviction relief. In support of his claim, Opsahl presented affidavits…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. BlancheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.