Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Crissey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 2002No. C1-01-1799PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent Heidi H. Crissey has been licensed to practice law in Minnesota since May 11, 1984. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (OLPR) served charges of unprofessional conduct on respondent pursuant to Rule 9(e), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). Respondent appeared for a prehearing meeting on December 22, 2000, but following the meeting failed to sign and return the prehearing statement and thereafter failed to otherwise cooperate with the OLPR.

The OLPR then brought a notice of motion and motion requesting the Lawyers Professional…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against DvorakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. In Re the Discipline of IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against VaughtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. In Re Fagre-StroetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RudawskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against FagrestroetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against SidersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API