Legal Opinion

Ewing v. City of Springfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1970No. 8804PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action in which plaintiffs, as owners of several contiguous tracts in Springfield, sought to have the City’s general zoning ordinance declared invalid as to the land described in the petition on the ground that it was unreasonable, arbitrary and confiscatory as so applied. The trial court found for the plaintiffs, and the City has appealed.

We have had first to examine the question of our jurisdiction. The City assures us, without citation of authority, that the case involves only the application, not the construction, of constitutional provisions;…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Krom v. City of ElmhurstIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Taylor v. Haverford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Tietjens v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Superior Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. KemperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hermel, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Craig v. Jo B. Gardner, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Westside Enterprises, Inc. v. City of DexterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Loomstein v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. White v. City of BrentwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API