Legal Opinion

Loomstein v. St. Louis County

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1980No. 40634PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

Plaintiffs own land in St. Louis County and, in 1977, they petitioned the St. Louis County Council to re-zone their property from a R-7 residential classification to a C-3 commercial classification. 1 One of the most intensive uses permitted by R-7 is a multi-family apartment complex. However, plaintiffs proposed to use their property for a fast food restaurant and, therefore, sought the rezoning. The County Council denied plaintiffs’ request.

Plaintiffs instituted this action against defendant St. Louis County for declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration that the continuance of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Huttig v. City of Richmond HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Tews v. WoolhiserIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. O'NEILL v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Binger v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Elam v. City of St. AnnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Ogawa v. City of Des PeresMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Lenette Realty & Investment Co. v. City of ChesterfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Despotis v. City of Sunset HillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Renick v. City of Maryland HeightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API