Legal Opinion

Krom v. City of Elmhurst

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1956No. 33617PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily

The city of Elmhurst here appeals from a judgment of the circuit court of Du Page County holding the city zoning ordinance, as amended, unconstitutional and void in its application to a parcel of land owned by Chicago Title and Trust Company, as trustee, and for which S. H. Krom, who is an appellee here along with the company, has entered into a contract of purchase.

The disputed property, consisting of 3.35 acres, is located very near the southern limit of the city. It is bounded on the south by Butterfield Road for a distance of 275.5 feet, on the southeast for 259 feet by a triangular lot…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Midland Electric Coal Corp. v. County of KnoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Northern Trust Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Mundelein Estates, Inc. v. Village of MundeleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Tews v. WoolhiserIllinois Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. La Salle National Bank v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Barrett v. HambySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Tomasek v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Exchange National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API