Legal Opinion

Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. Mumma

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 2007PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J.:

¶ 1 This matter involves what can be described as a property dispute between Pennsy Supply, Inc. (“Pennsy”), Robert Mumma II (“Mumma”), and companies with which Mumma is closely associated, ie., Kimbob, Inc. (“Kimbob”) and Caco Three, Inc. d/b/a McDermitt Concrete, Inc. (“McDermitt”). 1 The trial court entered several orders from which the parties appeal. The court entered orders on April 18, 2005, and April 19, 2005. Pennsy and Mumma appeal from these orders. These appeals are docketed in this Court at 691 MDA 2005, 706 MDA 2005, and 842 MDA 2005. The trial court later…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Summit Towne Centre, Inc. v. Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Wilson v. Transport Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wyland v. West Shore School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Carbis Walker, LLP v. Hill, Barth and King, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Donoughe v. Lincoln Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Duquesne Light Co. v. Longue Vue ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Richner v. McCanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API