Donoughe v. Lincoln Electric Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
McCAFFERY, J.:
¶ 1 Before the Court are cross-appeals from a judgment entered against Hobart Brothers Company (“Hobart”); the Lincoln Electric Company (“Lincoln”); and nine other manufacturers of asbestos products, in favor of John E. and Helen Do-noughe, husband and wife (collectively, “Donoughe”), in the total amount of $396,000, plus post-verdict interest. After careful review, we affirm as to Lincoln’s and Hobart’s claims, and vacate and remand as to Donoughe’s claim.
¶ 2 The factual and procedural history of this case, as set forth by the trial court, is as follows:
[This]…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tucker v. R.M. ToursSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Wolfe v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Martinez v. Triad Controls, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive, Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.