Legal Opinion

Donoughe v. Lincoln Electric Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 2007No. 357 EDA 2006, 488 EDA 2006PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 Before the Court are cross-appeals from a judgment entered against Hobart Brothers Company (“Hobart”); the Lincoln Electric Company (“Lincoln”); and nine other manufacturers of asbestos products, in favor of John E. and Helen Do-noughe, husband and wife (collectively, “Donoughe”), in the total amount of $396,000, plus post-verdict interest. After careful review, we affirm as to Lincoln’s and Hobart’s claims, and vacate and remand as to Donoughe’s claim.

¶ 2 The factual and procedural history of this case, as set forth by the trial court, is as follows:

[This]…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tucker v. R.M. ToursSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Wolfe v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Martinez v. Triad Controls, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive, Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API