Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Transport Ins. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 2005PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Mildred Wilson, asks us to vacate the judgment entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, following the non-jury trial verdict rendered in favor of Appellee, Transport Ins. Co., t/a TICO, Ins. Co. (“TICO”), in Appellant’s action against TICO for additional first-party medical benefits under the New Jersey “deemer” statute. We hold New Jersey’s two (2) year statute of limitations applies to Appellant’s claim. We further hold Appellant’s estoppel claim does not constitute a basis for relief from the applicable statute of limitations. Finally,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Devine v. HuttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. AMERIKOHL MIN. CO., INC. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Scott Hammersmith v. Tig Insurance Company (w.d. Of Pa. Civil Nos. 02-Cv-01829 & 03-Cv-01333)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. The Regents of the Mercersburg College v. Republic Franklin Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Grossi v. Travelers Personal Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Wyatt Inc. v. CITIZENS BANK OF PASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API