Legal Opinion
A.S. McGaughan Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 17, 1991No. 390-89CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This government contract case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff contracted with the United States to construct an addition to Abert Hall at the Defense Mapping Agency in Brookmont, Maryland. Plaintiff seeks compensation on behalf of its subcontractor for expenses incurred on encountering unexpected site conditions. In response, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that the site conditions actually encountered were indicated in the contract and contract-related documents. Plaintiff opposes the motion on the grounds…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Litton Industrial Products, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Solid State Systems Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Hoffman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- weston/bean Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Comtrol, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.