Legal Opinion
weston/bean Joint Venture v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 11, 2015No. 11-31C, 11-360CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Differing Site Condition; Constructive Change; Defective Design Specifications; FAR 52.236-2; FAR 52.243-4; FAR 52.249 — 10(b)(1); Maintenance Dredging; Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Liquidated Damages.
POST-TRIAL OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, Judge.
These consolidated cases arise out of a contract between the plaintiff, Weston/Bean Joint Venture 1 (“WBJV” or ‘Weston/Bean”), and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“USAGE” or “the Corps”) for the dredging of the Miami River and the disposal of contaminated sediments. Weston/Bean’s central claim is that although the contract was…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Leonard J. Klay v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- J-Way Southern, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Bes design/build, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Lcc-Mzt Team IV v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Peterson Industrial Depot, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018