Legal Opinion

Chournos v. D'AGNILLO

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1982No. 17362PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

In the district court, plaintiffs failed to establish a right-of-way by prescription over a strip of defendants’ property. On appeal, plaintiffs challenge the judgment on three grounds: (1) defendants are not fee simple owners of the disputed strip; (2) the evidence does not support the trial court’s finding; and (3) the trial court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the basis of surprise.

The parties own adjacent properties in Riverdale, Utah. Defendants are on the west and plaintiffs on the east, with River-dale Road on the south. The properties had once…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Andersen v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hogan v. BlakneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hartman v. PotterUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Jensen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Goddard v. HickmanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cornish Town v. KollerUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hancock v. Planned Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Stern v. Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & SandyUtah Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API