Chournos v. D'AGNILLO
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OAKS, Justice:
In the district court, plaintiffs failed to establish a right-of-way by prescription over a strip of defendants’ property. On appeal, plaintiffs challenge the judgment on three grounds: (1) defendants are not fee simple owners of the disputed strip; (2) the evidence does not support the trial court’s finding; and (3) the trial court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the basis of surprise.
The parties own adjacent properties in Riverdale, Utah. Defendants are on the west and plaintiffs on the east, with River-dale Road on the south. The properties had once…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Andersen v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Hogan v. BlakneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Hartman v. PotterUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Jensen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Goddard v. HickmanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Cornish Town v. KollerUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Hancock v. Planned Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Stern v. Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & SandyUtah Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.