Legal Opinion

Keller v. Thornton Canning Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1967No. Sac. 7789PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This ease turns on the shippers’ contention that because the carrier lacked a required permit from the Public Utilities Commission authorizing its operations as a radial highway common carrier, it could not file suit to recover the minimum rates that it should have charged. Following a trial on special defenses, the court entered judgment for the shippers; the carrier appeals. We have concluded that the policies and provisions of the Highway Carriers Act preclude the shippers’ defense to an action to recover the hauling tariff undercharges.

The original carrier involved in this matter was a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gardner v. Rich Manufacturing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. People Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. RyersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Johnston v. L. B. Hartz Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. South Tahoe Gas Co. v. Hofmann Land Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Transamerica Insurance v. Tab Transportation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Stenger v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API