SpinCycle, Inc. v. Kalender
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this breach of contract action is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to Counts II, III, VI, and VIII. The issues are fully briefed and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being deemed necessary. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied.
I. Background
This claim arises out of the sale of four laundromats from Burcin Kalender to SpinCycle, Inc. On September 30, 1998, SpinCycle and Kalender entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robinson v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Kantsevoy v. Lumenr LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Stanley v. Central Garden & Pet Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Ayres v. PHH MCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Ayres v. PHH Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.