Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Central Garden & Pet Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 19, 2012No. CIV. CCB-11-2401PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CATHERINE C. BLAKE, United States District Judge.
Plaintiff Dawn Stanley’s pet, a young French bulldog named Booker, suffered an intestinal injury after ingesting a piece of a chew toy. That toy was manufactured by T.F.H. Publications, Inc. (“TFH”), a subsidiary of Central Garden and Pet Corporation (“Central Garden”), and marketed under the Nylabone trade name as the. Double Action Chew Toy. Stanley alleges, among other claims, that the chew toy was defectively designed and that defendants failed to adequately warn pet owners of the medical risks associated with it. She seeks to sue…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brady v. Basic Research, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Singleton v. Domino's Pizza, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Boyd v. Coventry Health Care Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Decohen v. Abbasi, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Bond v. Marriott Intertional, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.