Legal Opinion

Croes v. Handlos

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1948No. 34,428PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion to open a default judgment and for leave to answer.

The only question requiring an answer here is whether a finding that defendant without reasonable excuse failed to answer is supported by a showing to the effect that defendant ignored both the advice of his attorney upon withdrawing to procure another one to interpose an answer and a notice received from the clerk that the case would be heard as a default on a specified date.

Plaintiff sued in conversion to recover one-half the value of a hay baler. He alleges that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Mountain v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  3. Barwald v. ThuetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Lodahl v. HedburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leonard Jack v. P and A Farms, LTD., D/B/A Crooked Creek Shooting PreserveSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Hill v. TischerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. LaFond v. SczepanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Nielsen, Stock & Blackburn v. Financial Acceptance Corp. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Frontier Lumber & Hardware, Inc. v. DickeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API