Croes v. Handlos
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
This appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion to open a default judgment and for leave to answer.
The only question requiring an answer here is whether a finding that defendant without reasonable excuse failed to answer is supported by a showing to the effect that defendant ignored both the advice of his attorney upon withdrawing to procure another one to interpose an answer and a notice received from the clerk that the case would be heard as a default on a specified date.
Plaintiff sued in conversion to recover one-half the value of a hay baler. He alleges that he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hughes v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Mountain v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Barwald v. ThuetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Lodahl v. HedburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leonard Jack v. P and A Farms, LTD., D/B/A Crooked Creek Shooting PreserveSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Hill v. TischerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- LaFond v. SczepanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Nielsen, Stock & Blackburn v. Financial Acceptance Corp. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Frontier Lumber & Hardware, Inc. v. DickeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.