Legal Opinion

Castle v. Cohen

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 11, 1988No. Nos. 87-1662, 87-1669, 87-1677PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal we are called upon to interpret a complex stock purchase agreement. The purchasers brought an action in the district court with claims premised upon various federal statutes. The complaint also sought specific performance and resolution of a number of pendent and ancillary state claims. In their answer, the sellers posited a host of counterclaims founded upon both state and federal law. The trial court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1331 (West Supp.1987). We have jurisdiction over this appeal from a final order. 28 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Bryson, Paul E. v. Brand Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Hicks v. FeeneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Glessner v. KennyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re Capital Cities/abc, Inc.'s Application for Access to Sealed Transcripts. Appeal of Capital Cities/abc, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API