Legal Opinion
Szymula v. Ash Grove Cement Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 13, 1996No. Civil Action 95-2325-GTVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover uncompensated overtime pay pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., arising out of her employment with Ash Grove Materials Corporation. The court has under consideration the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 31). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS
In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the court must examine any evidence tending ,to show triable issues in the light most…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes and Dr. Robert GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Green v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Harbert v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Salon Enterprises, Inc. v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- Barth v. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Sanders v. Glendale Restaurant Concepts LPDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.