Legal Opinion

Salon Enterprises, Inc. v. Langford

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 29, 2000No. 84,135PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schiffner, C.J.:

Salon Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Par Exsalonce Hair Salon (Par Exsalonce) appeals from the ruling of the trial court that Par Exsalonce violated the Kansas Wage Payment Act (KWPA), K.S.A. 44-312 et seq., and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 (1994) et seq.

Joan and Ronald Sandstrom are the owners and directors of Par Exsalonce. In November 1992, Par Exsalonce hired Topaze Lang-ford as a hairstylist. No written employment agreement was entered into although Langford signed a form prepared pro se by Par Exsalonce agreeing not to work within 5 miles of Par…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Kostas Mechmet v. Four Seasons Hotels, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Bush v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Szymula v. Ash Grove Cement Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  5. Slattery v. HCA Wesley Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Craig v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Smith v. Kansas Orthopaedic Center, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  3. A.O. Smith Corp. v. Kansas Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  4. Stahl v. Delicor of Puget Sound, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Discover Bank Discover Financial Services, Incorporated v. Betty E. Vaden v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Amicus Curiae. John R. Kucan, Jr. Terry Coates, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API