Legal Opinion

Salmon v. Davis County

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1996No. 940315PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*891DURHAM, Justice:

David L. Salmon appeals from á judgment awarding him attorney fees pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 63-30a-2 for the successful defense of two misdemeanor criminal charges. Salmon contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying him the full amount of attorney fees incurred in his defense. Although the majority does not join my opinion on this issue, I would agree with Salmon and reverse. Salmon also asserts that the trial court erred in holding that he was not entitled to recover the attorney fees necessarily incurred in litigating his right to attorney fees under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Prandini v. National Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. MEADOWBROOK, LLC v. FlowerUtah Supreme Court · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API