Legal Opinion

MEADOWBROOK, LLC v. Flower

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1998No. 970080PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

Defendants Edward Flower and Lauretta Pelton appeal the trial court’s denial of their post-trial motion for attorney fees that they filed five days after the jury returned a verdict in their favor but before entry of final judgment. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

The facts are undisputed for purposes of this appeal. Meadowbrook, LLC (“Meadow-brook”), which owns Meadowbrook Mobile Home Park, brought an action to evict defendants, alleging that they had failed to comply with certain mobile home park rules and that their lease should therefore be terminated. At trial, the jury…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Stockman v. DownsSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. McGuire v. Russell Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Gables at Sterling Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Castlewood-Sterling Vill. I, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. ProMax Development Corp. v. RaileUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. LuskUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API