Legal Opinion
Chamberlin v. Twin Ports Development Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 1935No. 30,414PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
The defendant Edward Hammon appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The action is to enjoin the foreclosure of a $1,500 mortgage on plaintiff’s home in the city of St. Paul and to have it adjudged that there is no more than $400 with interest unpaid thereon. The facts found by the court are, in substance: Defendant Tivin Ports Development Company is a domestic corporation, organized and managed by defendant Conner for the promotion of the sale of lots in St. Paul and Superior, Wisconsin. Plaintiff, a widow, owned a home in St. Paul of the value of $4,000. She…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Olsen v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- McWethy v. NorbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Johnson v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- First National Bank v. DenfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eldon's Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Annis v. AnnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997